Corporate and transactions
Joint ventures, contractual partnerships and consortia need precise agreement on contributions, management authority, financing, profit-sharing and risk. Many disputes between investors arise because decision-making, a partner’s exit or the consequences of a breach were not clearly provided for. Ghazaal Majdzadeh Legal Practice advises on structuring partnerships and drafting investment agreements in line with the parties’ commercial goals and legal requirements.
Services
Designing and reviewing joint venture agreements and setting the investors’ rights and obligations.
Choosing and documenting the right legal structure for project-based cooperation.
Voting rights, limits of authority, share transfers and dispute resolution.
Decision-making rules, funding, project control and reporting.
Each party’s share of profit, loss, costs and risk.
Share transfer, valuation, termination and dispute resolution on exit.
A shared goal is not enough. The agreement must say who decides, how each partner’s obligations are performed, what a change of circumstances means and which mechanism applies if there is a dispute or one party leaves.
How we work
Objectives, contributions and each party’s role.
Comparing a company, a contractual partnership or a consortium.
Governance, financing, returns and exit documented.
Alongside you to signature and implementation.
No. Depending on the project’s purpose and the governing rules, a joint venture can be structured contractually or through a separate legal entity. The choice should reflect the parties’ liability, management, tax and how a partner can exit.
Each partner’s contribution, financing, management authority, the sharing of profit and loss, share transfers and dispute resolution are the key issues. Breach, management deadlock and termination should also be provided for clearly.
First, the type of contribution, the due date and the contractual remedies need to be reviewed. Depending on the case, a claim for performance, damages or other contractual mechanisms may be available.
Mechanisms such as referral to a named decision-maker, staged negotiation or agreed share-transfer procedures can help resolve deadlock. How valid and effective each method is depends on the company’s structure and the governing rules.
That depends on the type of partnership, the agreement, the governing rules and the other partners’ rights. Transfer restrictions, exit rights, valuation and any remaining obligations should be reviewed before taking any step.
A partnership agreement usually sets the framework of cooperation and each party’s obligations for a specific activity or project. A shareholders’ agreement deals mainly with the relationship between shareholders: voting rights, management of the company, share transfers and protective mechanisms, although the two can overlap.
Send a short outline; Dr Majdzadeh reviews it personally.
Related: Corporate Legal Advisory · Commercial Litigation & Contracts · Foreign Investment and Market Entry
This page is general information, not legal advice. The answer in any particular matter depends on its own documents and circumstances.
